About 3D Printing Can’t Define The Future Of The Humanity

While there is the whole buzz around citing 3D printing as the definite future of humanity, I beg to differ for certain reasons that I have penned down below.

To start with, the 3D mechanism here banks on resin, and it is actually harmful to our body. You don’t always need to come in physical contact with it to understand the danger- in fact; you will end up hurting your eyes even if you stare at it for long. It’s because 3D printing uses a substance which is made from combustion at temperatures above and below the notified marks.

For those with little or no idea regarding 3D printing, here goes a brief:

3D printing technology is deployed in several industries working for defense and manufacturing. Moreover, other industries or trades those need to work with complex designs as well as have the requirement of high-demand products, also count on 3D printing.

After much thought, I came to the view that 3D printing isn’t the very proposal that is thoroughly checked by government agencies. What’s much alarming is that the industries mentioned above are only risking lives through wrong inputs just because they are eyeing profit from collateral of false propaganda or otherwise via inverted calculation.

The energy deployed in its frequent support just adds to high voltage & systematic harm for our environment. Whatever logic these industries put forward to justify their investment on 3D printing is always pertinent to their interests & profits, and they never care for the consumer.

This is to stress here that the very theoretical dynamics aren’t exactly sought through reliable findings. The very situational drama that we see is just a gathered perception, and changes in written dimensions only imply complete dilution of subject expertise.

On the other hand, the second primary reason behind the high end propagated interference shows relation to high judgment that doesn’t exactly meet either existence of the relative precautions or non-portal behavior.

I consider myself, and I am also recognized as an individual of high values who is well aware of this interest of these industries in using 3D printing. Thus, I would not consciously wish anybody to use 3D printing so that our nature can be saved from the harm caused by fake or faulty hypothesis.

Our Mother Earth is calm and resilient, and even though she knows about these high profile people, she stays silent. But I realized this should not be allowed for long. Yes, it took me the immense courage to state my views here that clashes with the interest of the top guns but still this is my ardent request you to boycott the harmful 3D printing practice immediately. We all have to be very serious about it for the sake of benefit of our existence.

The Republicans hardly have any idea about value steered by the consumer goods. However, I feel, our fellow citizens should be careful about the crucial justification which leads to this savage thinking. Reduced harm would be able to sub judice high theories and reduction in supplements forms the root cause of the true behavior.

Finally, the whole stuff is bounded by breakthrough subjects which don’t implement situational devaluation.